Letter to the Editor
Vol. 4, Issue 1, 2024 · P1-4
Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Actionable Takeaways from the 2023 Precision Oncology Summit
Inas Abuali, MD,Ivy Riano, MD,Hannah Abrams, MD,Abdul Moiz Khan, MD,Hanlee P Ji, MD
Submission received: 2023-12-20 / Accepted: 2024-01-29 / Published: 2024-02-28
Take Home Messages
1. Transformation of basic research in GI cancers through new tools is underway including discoveries using new DNA sequencing methods, single cell and spatial molecular approaches, and methylation sequencing.
2. Progress in therapeutic development in GI cancers has been limited relative to that of many other solid tumors. Translational efforts are critical for therapeutic advances and to overcome tumor- and target-related factors unique to GI malignancies.
3. Biliary cancer is an example of an anatomically and genomically heterogenous malignancy, and targeted therapies against mutated oncogenes are highly effective.
Introduction
The 2023 Precision Oncology Summit was held in San Francisco on October 7th and 8th, focusing on actionable strategies addressing personalized treatment to improve patient outcomes. This manuscript summarizes the discussion and key learning points from the precision medicine clinical science symposium in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.
Basic Science in Gastrointestinal Precision Oncology
Basic studies of GI cancers investigate how the process by which these tumors start, grow, and then spread to other organ sites, and how to noninvasively measure that growth, through modalities such as cellular genomics, molecular spatial analysis, and cell free molecular analysis. GI cancers are characterized by genetic diversity. Initiating and cooperative drivers lead to increased cellular heterogeneity with eventual formation of cancer cells. Many cancer driver mutations and chromosomal rearrangements can be identified via whole genome analysis. Single cell analysis can also identify genetic and genomic alterations.
Citing an example of a digestive tract cancer and its corresponding molecular and cellular changes, a cascade of histopathologic changes due to an inciting infectious organism can lead to chronic gastritis, followed by atrophic gastritis, followed by intestinal metaplasia and finally gastric cancer. Early cancer cells have characteristic features that can be identified using new experimental methods such as spatial gene expression, prior to the development of an invasive malignancy, representing an earlier time point. The tumor microenvironment promotes growth and metastatic spread and has characteristic features that can be detected via single cell and spatial molecular analysis.1 Finally, tumor growth and molecular changes can be monitored from the blood, as methylation sequencing in colorectal cancer for example can provide a means for longitudinal tracking of metastatic colon cancer.2
Translational Science Considerations in GI Malignancies
Progress has stalled in reducing mortality from GI malignancies as compared to other solid malignancies, and there is an urgent need for new FDA-approved drugs in this sphere.3
Translational efforts are key to bringing successful therapeutic options to the GI oncology clinic. One example is the exploration of KRAS G12C inhibitors in colorectal cancers (CRC). Those targeted therapies are FDA-approved for non-small cell lung cancer but have shown limited efficacy in CRC due to high levels of RTK signaling by CRC tumors which confer resistance.4 Translational studies, however, demonstrate the potential of cetuximab combinations in improving clinical efficacy, via reversal of this resistance mechanism.5
A phase 1/2 study of adagrasib and cetuximab reveals an improvement in median PFS of 6.9 months vs 5.6 months with adagrasib alone.6 Interim results of a phase 1 trial of GDC-6036, a next generation G12C inhibitor, in combination with cetuximab has shown a confirmed ORR of 62%, as presented by Desai et al. in the 2023 American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting.
Precision Oncology in Biliary Tract Malignancies
Biliary tract malignancies are notable for their anatomic and genomic heterogeneity, and potential for targeted therapies against mutated oncogenes. Approximately one third of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) have targetable mutations such as FGFR2 fusions and rearrangements, IDH1 mutations and BRAF V600E mutations.
While detection of FGFR2 fusions can be difficult, they are present in about 10% of patients with ICC. Pemigatinib, an ATP-competitive FGFR inhibitor was approved here in the US in 2020 after demonstrating ORR of 35.5% and a median PFS of 6.9 months.7 Futibatinib, a covalent inhibitor, received accelerated approval in the US in 2022, with a median PFS of 9 months, and median OS of 21.7 months in the second line setting for FGFR2-rearranged cholangiocarcinoma.8
IDH1 mutations occur in approximately 13% of ICC.9 Ivosidenib, a selective oral inhibitor of mutant IDH1, was approved in 2021 after the ClarIDHy trial demonstrated an improvement in median PFS of 2.7 vs 1.4 months, median OS 10.3 vs 7.5 months and ORR of 2% vs 0% as compared to placebo.10 Finally, 5-7% of patients with ICC harbor a BRAF V600E mutation and the combination of Dabrafenib with Trametinib can be utilized in this setting with promising response rates.
Future directions in the field will center around antibodies paving the way to precision enrollment in CAR T trials. Zolbetuximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting Claudin18.2, a protein expressed in the tight junction of gastric mucosa cells, and its addition to chemotherapy results in improved PFS and OS in gastric malignancies expressing Claudin 18.2.
Claudin 18.2 CAR shows early promise in gastric/GEJ malignancies, with ORR of 57.1% and 6-month OS of 81.2%11 On-target and off-tumor toxicity is a major limitation to the implementation of engineered T cells targeting solid tumors, since almost all potential CAR T cell targets are also expressed on healthy tissue. Therefore, new cellular designs which build circuits for cell-cell recognition and signal integration are necessary to allow for customized sense/response programs.12 These efforts will eventually move from bench to bedside and revolutionize our current care paradigm.
Conclusion
In conclusion, progress in GI oncology relies on further translational research that can pave the way towards enhancing our current therapeutic options.
Conflict of Interest
HPJ reports travel support from Oxford Nanopore and research support from 10X Genomics.
The other authors do not have a conflict of interest.
Funding Information
N/A
Ethical Statements
N/A
Informed Consent
N/A
Data Availability Statement
N/A
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Drs. Chris Chen, Eric Collisson and George A. Fisher Jr for their engaging sessions during the Precision Oncology Summit meeting, which are highlighted in this manuscript.
Declaration of AI Use in Scientific Writing
N/A
Author Contributions
Concept and design: IAA, IR, HA, AMK, HPJ
Data acquisition: IAA, IR, HA, AMK, HPJ
Data analysis and interpretation: IAA
Drafting of the manuscript: IAA
Critical revision of the manuscript: IAA, IR, HA, AMK, HPJ
All authors (IAA, IR, HA, AMK, HPJ) approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, in accordance with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors criteria.
References
1. Sathe A, Mason K, Grimes SM, et al. Colorectal cancer metastases in the liver establish immunosuppressive spatial networking between tumor-associated SPP1+ macrophages and fibroblasts. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29(1):244-260. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2041
2. Lau BT, Almeda A, Schauer M, et al. Single-molecule methylation profiles of cell-free DNA in cancer with nanopore sequencing. Genome Med. 2023;15(1):33. doi:10.1186/s13073-023-01178-3
3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33. doi:10.3322/caac.21708
4. Amodio V, Yaeger R, Arcella P, et al. EGFR blockade reverts resistance to KRAS G12C inhibition in colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(8):1129-1139. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0187
5. Awad MM, Liu S, Rybkin II, et al. Acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibition in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(25):2382-2393. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2105281
6. Yaeger R, Weiss J, Pelster MS, et al. Adagrasib with or without cetuximab in colorectal cancer with mutated KRAS G12C. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(1):44-54. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2212419
7. Abou-Alfa GK, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, et al. Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(5):671-684. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30109-1
8. Goyal L, Meric-Bernstam F, Hollebecque A, et al. Futibatinib for FGFR2-rearranged intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(3):228-239. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2206834
9. Boscoe AN, Rolland C, Kelley RK. Frequency and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic literature review. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10(4):751-765. doi:10.21037/jgo.2019.03.10
10. Zhu AX, Macarulla T, Javle MM, et al. Final overall survival efficacy results of ivosidenib for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1 mutation: the phase 3 randomized clinical ClarIDHy trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(11):1669-1677. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3836
11. Qi C, Gong J, Li J, et al. Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med. 2022;28(6):1189-1198. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01800-8
12. Morsut L, Roybal KT, Xiong X, et al. Engineering customized cell sensing and response behaviors using synthetic Notch receptors. Cell. 2016;164(4):780-791. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.012
