Education Academy Logo
Journal Logo

Conference Abstracts - Summit on Cancer Health Disparities (SCHD26)

Vol. 6, Issue Supplement 1, 2026 · S1-3

Comparison of POCUS and Cart Ultrasound Devices for the Breast and Axilla

Jenny Edge, MD,Jenny Haberfeld, MD,Areeb Siddiqui, MD,Susan Harvey, MD

POCUSBreast UltrasoundBreast cancer disparitiesEarly Detection

Submission received: 2025-12-15 / Accepted: 2026-01-07 / Published: 2026-02-14

CCBY-SA-4.0
Publication: IJCCDhttps://doi.org/10.53876/001a.129704
2

Abstract

Background

Globally breast cancer causes a death every minute and many deaths are avoidable if underserved women had access to early detection. We estimate that 1,000 of the 1,800 women's lives could be saved each day if this inequity was resolved. (1-9) We have a transformative point of care (POC) breast cancer model that detects, diagnoses and treats breast cancer in a single visit at low cost and at the heart of this is model point of care ultrasound (POCUS). Our hypothesis is that POCUS devices are non-inferior to cart ultrasound (US) for effective use in whole breast US and axillary assessment and biopsy guidance.

Methods

Following informed consent 8 women aged 18 to 65 were scanned with a Toshiba cart US (Aplio 300) and with the GE Vscan Air™Cl, Lumify L12-4, Butterfly iQ3 and Clarius l15 HD3. We scanned the breast and the ipsilateral axilla. Each device was rated by breast US experts 3 radiologists and 1 breast surgeon, for near field resolution, depth assessment, internal lesion resolution, margin assessment, blood flow, shadowing and interface artifacts, dermal line clarity, axilla resolution and ease of use. Each category was rated from 1 to 5 by consensus.

Results

Ratings of each of the image quality categories were recorded and totaled. The Clarius device was inoperable. The remaining POCUS devices were equivalent or outperformed the Toshiba cart (Aplio 300) for breast and axillary assessment and for biopsy guidance acceptance.

Conclusion

Vscan, Butterfly, Lumify were adequate by 4 breast US providers to assess lesions and acceptance to guide biopsies of the breast and the axilla. These POCUS devices are low cost, battery operated, portable and effective for POC breast US and can be paired with existing AI tools. This is a potential solution for inequities in breast cancer early detection globally at POC.

References

1. World Health Organization March 13, 2024, Breast Cancer

2. American Cancer Society 2024 Key Statistics for Breast Cancer

3. Oluwasanu, Mojisola et al. Global disparities in breast cancer outcomes: new perspectives, widening inequities, unanswered questions The Lancet Global Health, Volume 8, Issue 8, e978 - e979

4. Brot HF, Mango VL https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.23116 eISSN: 2288-5943 Ultrasonography 2024;43:3-14

5. Jitendra Parmar, Sumita Choudhary, Anagha Zope, Tapan Patel, Nishith Chaudhari, Sandip Shah, Maulik Vora, Harsh Vyas. Comprehensive Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and Mammography in Young Women with Radiographically Dense Breasts. Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research 6 (2022): 308-321

6. Weimer Johannes Matthias, Kuhn Eva, Ludwig Michael, Malle Goodluck Lincoln, Kapipi Godfrid, Schäfer Valentin Sebastian, Sadiq Adnan, Henke Oliver (2024) Effectiveness of an ultrasound basic cancer training program through on-site training and virtual case discussions in rural Tanzania: a proof-of-concept studycancer181722

7. Chen HL, Zhou JQ, Chen Q, Deng YC. Comparison of the sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and combinations of these imaging modalities for the detection of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 2;100(26):e26531. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026531. PMID: 34190189;

8. Hey, M.T., Masimbi, O., Shimelash, N. et al. Simulation-Based Breast Biopsy Training Using a Low-Cost Gelatin-Based Breast Model in Rwanda. World J Surg 47, 2169–2177 (2023). <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07038-w>

9. Murthy SS, Ntirenganya F, Scott JW et al. A randomized cross-over trial focused on breast core needle biopsy skill acquisition and safety using high fidelity versus low fidelity simulation models in Rwanda. J Surg Educ (2020) 77: 404–41210.1016/j.jsurg.2019.11.01431902690