Patient Navigation Based Care-delivery to Reduce Inequities in Cancer Care Among Immigrants and Refugees: A Commentary on the Successes and the Unmet Needs

As of 2019, a total of 44.9 million documented immigrants and refugees (IRPs) reside in the US.¹ Although annual refugee resettlement and ceiling policies have led to smaller numbers and slower rates of refugees arriving in the US in recent decades, from 250,000 in 1980 to fewer than 12,000 in 2020,² there have been periodic upshifts due to political circumstances. For example, after the recent political change in Afghanistan in August 2021, a total of 150,000 Afghan refugees arrived in the US.¹ The constant and diverse stream of IRPs poses many healthcare challenges including healthcare access and routine health maintenance given their new and unfamiliar context. At the same time, healthcare systems do not have adequate familiarity, fiscal and human resources, or trusted connectors to these communities to forge bridges to healthcare quickly.³

The ongoing influx of IRPs within the United States has generated heterogeneity among this group in terms of spoken language, culturally-based health behaviors, and health literacy rates.⁴ Moreover, IRPs are faced with their own unique physical and psychological health challenges that, in some cases compel their emigration here. Indeed, given the diversity of racial, ethnic, and religious beliefs, IRP populations will have different sociocultural norms that influence healthcare decisions.^5‑8 As such, diverse approaches to addressing their unmet health needs and specific health challenges are necessary. At the same time, IRPs share some commonalities with historically underserved communities in the U.S., including the lack of healthcare access and limited health literacy. IRP's therefore similarly struggle to navigate the complex healthcare systems, which leads to suboptimal use of primary care visits and preventive healthcare, including cancer screening.⁹ Furthermore, most patient education materials are developed at high school level standards in the US, and resources for those with low English proficiency and health literacy are lacking.^10,11 This gap poses additional challenges to cancer screening and control within the IRPs. Given the influx of IRPs, patient navigators (PNs) to help them navigate through the US healthcare system and to assist with coordination of healthcare screenings, follow up medical appointments would be invaluable.

While immigrants and refugees vary in literacy rates, employment rates, and financial securities, some challenges may overlap.^12,13 For example, among the refugee populations, suboptimal use of cancer screening may be related to limited access to resources and barriers related to social determinants of health (SDOH) such as food and housing insecurities, barriers to language, technology, transportation, and neighborhood factors.^14,15 However, among the immigrant populations, low cancer screening rates may not be directly related to the barriers associated with the SDOH, but other overlapping factors such as lack of trust in preventive healthcare and healthcare systems and/or cultural beliefs limiting timely cancer screening procedures.¹⁶ Other impediments include the inability to leave work for medical appointments, difficulties navigating through the system to schedule an appointment, fear of an abnormal test result, and anxiety around spousal and family acceptance of cancer screening.^17,18

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected IPRs.¹⁹ The above SDOH specific to IPRs were further exacerbated during the pandemic with loss of job/economic insecurity, high population density, public transport dependency, high contact risk jobs, comorbidities, poor digital health access, fear/xenophobia, and loss of insurance.^20,21 More specifically cancer patients have been significantly affected by the pandemic as evidenced by the World Health Organization reporting significant disruptions in cancer care early in the pandemic, delaying diagnosis, therapy, and clinical trials.^22,23 A retrospective cross-sectional study conducted by Hsueh et al. demonstrated that limited English proficiency was associated with lower video visit usage.²⁴ For many IPRs who have limited English proficiency, problems with access to telemedicine and scarcity of multilingual PNs or translators posed a significant challenge. Utilization of PNs must be viewed within the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which as described above has exacerbated health disparities for IPRs as a whole and even more specifically in the subset IPR cancer patients.

To address both the shared system-level and specific sociocultural barriers to healthcare, linguistically appropriate and culturally tailored care-delivery models, i.e. innovative methods that employ utilization of PNs, have been deployed with moderate success.^25‑27 The use of patient navigation, specifically within the context of cancer control, has been assessed to elucidate barriers and facilitators to improved care access.^18,28 Certain factors have portended success including collaboration with the local community – based organizations (CBOs) or faith-based organizations (FBOs), and using mobile and telehealth-based care-delivery models which have yielded positive gains in mammography and cervical cancer screening among various IRPs.^{26, 27} Herein, a discussion on the historical aspects of PN in the US is necessary. The effective involvement of CBOs and FBOs in cancer care delivery to IRPs in the US may also be supportive in expanded discussions on equity.

In the early 1990s, under the pioneering work of Dr. Harold Freeman, care-delivery models incorporating PNs gained traction. PN- based care-delivery improved cancer screening rates among diverse populations, especially in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).^29‑32 For example, the Cancer Project launched in a province of India used volunteer village health workers to help spot early signs of head and neck cancer, resulting in over 50% of those referred for screening testing positive for cancer.³³ In the Caribbean, Badal et al. developed a program to train lay navigators in multiple domains of cancer care aligning with the guidelines of the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). This PN training course focused on development of a set of comprehensive core competencies, clinical PN skill requirements and curriculum development.³⁴ A total of 28 participated in this program with varied backgrounds, and programmatic skills were evaluated in three areas (navigation skills, research skills and professional sills). The ACS/NCI guidelines' based training was successful and the lay navigators evaluated that the objectives of the curriculum and the content were met.³⁴

Within the US, PNs' role in advancing cancer control also gained interest.^46,47 In a recent policy statement by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the organization underscored the vital need to provide equitable access to cancer research, prevention strategies to reduce aggressive cancer incidences, and treatment.⁴⁸ These disparities have highlighted the unmet needs and opportunities for health systems' strategic planning of infrastructure, workforce development, PN training, community-based participatory research (CBPR), and community-academic collaborations.^48,49 Lastly, the underutilization of leveraging faith-based organizations in many of the outreach efforts has lessened the impact of dedicated research databases for data collection.⁴⁸ Through the partnership with CBOs and FBOs, many studies have reported PN-guided improvements in cancer screening for breast cancer.^18,50,51

Efforts to train CHWs in low- and middle-income countries have also been successful in demonstrating the ability to increase early detection of breast cancer.^32‑34 As an example, Gutnik et al reported on an effort in Tanzania wherein the absence of access to mammography, CHWs were trained to help women learn how to perform breast self-examinations (BSE) resulting in significant downstaging of diagnoses after three years.³² Results from a program in Malawi using laywomen to conduct clinical breast examinations (CBE) and provide related education reported positive outcomes for participants who received the education and CBE, and a motivation to share their acquired knowledge to increase screening among their social networks.^33,34

PNs are underutilized in active cancer treatment, survivorship and palliative care which represents a growth opportunity. In a study, Rohan et al., examined PNs and community health workers engagement across National Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs (NCCCP) and reported that 82% (n=53) of 65 NCCCP action plans had content related to PN, and their involvement in cancer screening (60%), and survivorship (55%). The majority of these plans (81%) described workforce development, training and standardizing roles and competencies. However, the patient level involvement of PN included addressing their barriers in 36% (n=23) of patients, outreach (36% (n=19)), resource dissemination (25% (n=13)), psychosocial support (9% (n=5)), clinical trial discussion (8% (n=4)),reducing disparities (40% (n=21)), highlighting the unmet needs in this area.⁴⁷ Other studies also highlight the efficacy and potential opportunities of PN- based care-delivery and cancer care navigation to address the barriers, including patient education based on an individual's health literacy, connection to community resources, and offering cancer screening via governmental programs.^52‑54

Regrettably, while the number of cancer survivors from underserved communities, including IRPs, is increasing, overall inequities in cancer survivorship are worsening.⁵⁵ Potential reasons for overall inequities in cancer survivorship include fragmented care after patients no longer see their oncologist, lack of knowledge of appropriate health behaviors after cancer, and barriers to information about financial or psychosocial support.^56‑58 All of these reasons are compounded for non-English speakers and immigrants.^59,60 The ongoing challenges for cancer survivors, including managing their long-term treatment-related toxicities and psychosocial aspects, continue across all underserved communities, including IRPs.⁶¹ However, there are currently few models for delivering culturally-tailored and linguistically-appropriate care for IRPs in terms of survivorship.^62,63 Wenzel et al. conducted focus groups evaluating the role of community health workers in navigating and coordinating cancer treatment and addressing the needs among older African American cancer survivors. Although most of the study participants had limited prior experience with navigation, the authors reported participants' acknowledgment of their support in both formal and informal caregiving and the need for ongoing studies in this area.⁶⁴

Currently, educational material dedicated to patients with low health literacy is lacking.^11,65 Most cancer centers in the US offer patient educational resources in English and Spanish leaving out all other languages for minority and refugee populations. Nevertheless, even for English proficient patients, there is a dearth of educational resources for patients with low health literacy, as reviewed by Parker et al.¹¹ The authors reported a paucity of literature in health literacy-based development and a lack of incorporating participants' feedback into chemo education tools for breast cancer patients. The authors identified crucial gaps in three categories: 1) theoretical underpinnings using theoretical frameworks for educational material development, 2) health literacy principles, and 3) pilot testing of the educational materials.¹¹ The emphasis was on written material development in the first two categories to promote clarity/ readability of the content and graphics and illustrations. Only three pilot studies in their review incorporated feedback from patients and their families into the written content.^66‑68 Furthermore, given the rapidly evolving changes in the field of oncology and advances in technology, patients' learning styles have evolved with preferences of video/online-based information in addition to written materials.^69‑71 In a Rural Oncology Literacy Enhancement Study (ROLES), Martinez- Donate et al. conducted in-depth interviews and health literacy assessments among five rural oncology clinics. They found multiple unmet patient navigation needs, health literacy limitations leading to barriers in quality cancer care.⁵² More recently, Suk et al. showed that those of Asian ethnicity had higher rates of overdue cervical cancer screening compared to non-Hispanic White individuals with lack of knowledge reported as the biggest barrier to receiving timely screening across all study groups, further highlighting the gaps in health literacy and the important role PNs can play in cancer screening of IRPs.⁷² At a healthcare systems' level, lack of patient education material based on their health literacy is a barrier, and we must develop patient education material focusing on various health literacy levels, and utilization of PNs in patient education may temporarily overcome some of the existing barriers.

Research and previous experience have demonstrated that patient navigation plays a vital role in cancer control and cancer care delivery, particularly in meeting sociocultural and language needs; and addressing the SDOH-related barriers to healthcare access among minority communities, including IRPs.^{18,25,31,54,73} Despite the shortage of multilingual PNs, some institutional investment may contribute to building a deep trust among the communities and patients, especially for those with mistrust in the health systems, and for those who are linguistically challenged to address their worry and fear around cancer screening procedures, treatment and survivorship.^16,27 Similarly, collaboration with community- and faith-based organizations in care-delivery models are of utmost importance to bridge the gaps and build trust between the providers and patients.^27,74 Many other providers and researchers have also used mobile health technologies such as a mobile mammographic unit delivering the screening at faith-based organizations, catering to women with language and transportation barriers.¹⁸ Although a few studies examined screening and education on cervical and colorectal cancer screening and other behavioral and lifestyle modifications such as smoking cessation, expansion of these efforts through multilingual PN-based care delivery with community engagement and outreach is vital to the target populations.⁷⁵ Furthermore, future efforts in dedicating research funding to PN-led care in these areas are essential to address the inequities across the cancer continuum.

As the U.S. becomes increasingly diverse, new models of care delivery drawing on lessons learned from the successful use of PNs in LMICs can be used to address barriers to quality cancer care faced by IRPs. Optimizing collaborations with the community- and faith-based organizations can assist in overcoming cultural and linguistic hurdles and building trust between individuals and the health care system. More research is needed to define best practices and demonstrate cost-effectiveness to build sustainable programs.

None

Previously funded by Susan G. Komen Foundation

Research was approved by the IRB at MCW, and the research has been conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and ethics committee

We acknowledge all the community partners and the faith-based centers in Milwaukee and the neighboring counties for their dedication and support in bringing breast cancer awareness among women. Also, the authors are thankful to the community leaders, volunteers, CHWs, navigators and the interpreters who spent countless number of hours throughout the study period

1. Sailaja Kamaraju, MD, MS: conception and design

2. Sailaja Kamaraju, Melissa DeNomie, Anjishnu Banerjee, Arman Tahir, Fauzie Quereshi: Data collection and assembly

3. Sailaja Kamaraju, Anjishnu Banerjee, Melissa DeNomie: Data analysis, manuscript writing

1. Melinda Stolley: mentor

All authors have approved the manuscript

Submitted: January 21, 2022 PST, Accepted: February 26, 2022 PST

1. U.S. Committee For Refugees and Immigrants. Published online 2021.

2. Office of Refugee Resettlement -Health Insurance. US Department of Health and Human Services. Published online 2021.

3. Predictors of Delayed Healthcare Seeking Among American Muslim Women. Journal of Women's Health. 2016;25(6):586-593. doi:10.1089/jwh.2015.5517

4. Gostjev F. United We Stand? The Role of Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Immigration and Violent Crime Relationship at the Neighborhood Level. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity. 2017;3(3):398-416. doi:10.1177/2332649216680100

5. MacDowell H, Pyakurel S, Acharya J, Morrison- Beedy D, Kue J. Perceptions Toward Mental Illness and Seeking Psychological Help among Bhutanese Refugees Resettled in the U.S. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020;41(3):243-250. doi:10.1080/01612840.2019.1646362

6. Wang AMQ, Yung EM, Nitti N, Shakya Y, Alamgir AKM, Lofters AK. Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers Among Immigrants and Refugees: A Mixed-Methods Study at Three Community Health Centres in Toronto, Canada. J Immigr Minor Health. 2019;21(3):473-482. doi:10.1007/s10903-018-0779-5

7. Thikeo M, Florin P, Ng C. Help Seeking Attitudes Among Cambodian and Laotian Refugees: Implications for Public Mental Health Approaches. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17(6):1679-1686. doi:10.1007/s10903-015-0171-7

8. Padela AI, Killawi A, Forman J, DeMonner S, Heisler M. American Muslim Perceptions of Healing: Key Agents in Healing, and Their Roles. Qualitative Health Research. 2012;22(6):846-858. doi:10.1177/1049732312438969

9. Son E, Moring NS, Igdalsky L, Parish SL. Navigating the health-care system in community: perspectives from Asian immigrant parents of children with special health-care needs. J Child Health Care. 2018;22(2):251-268. doi:10.1177/1367493517753084

10. Ownby RL, Waldrop-Valverde D, Taha J. Why Is Health Literacy Related to Health? An Exploration Among U.S. National Assessment of Adult Literacy Participants 40 Years of Age and Older. Educational Gerontology. 2012;38(11):776-787. doi:10.1080/03601277.2011.645441

11. Parker PD, Heiney SP, Friedman DB, et al. How are health literacy principles incorporated into breast cancer chemotherapy education? a review of the literature. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2018;8(6):77-84. doi:10.5430/jnep.v8n6p77

12. Peterman JN, Silka L, Bermudez OI, Wilde PE, Rogers BL. Acculturation, education, nutrition education, and household composition are related to dietary practices among Cambodian refugee women in Lowell, MA. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(9):1369-1374. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.06.005

13. Rao D. Choice of medicine and hierarchy of resort to different health alternatives among Asian Indian migrants in a metropolitan city in the USA. Ethn Health. 2006;11(2):153-167. doi:10.1080/13557850500460306

14. Raines Milenkov A, Felini M, Baker E, et al. Uptake of cancer screenings among a multiethnic refugee population in North Texas, 2014-2018. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0230675. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230675

15. Tappen RM, Cooley ME, Luckmann R, Panday S. Digital Health Information Disparities in Older Adults: a Mixed Methods Study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. Published online 2021:1-11. doi:10.1007/s40615-020-00931-3

16. Pourat N, Kagawa-Singer M, Breen N, Sripipatana A. Access versus acculturation: identifying modifiable factors to promote cancer screening among Asian American women. Med Care. 2010;48(12):1088-1096. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f53542

17. Allen EM, Lee HY, Pratt R, et al. Facilitators and Barriers of Cervical Cancer Screening and Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination Among Somali Refugee Women in the United States: A Qualitative Analysis. J Transcult Nurs. 2019;30(1):55-63. doi:10.1177/1043659618796909

18. Kamaraju S, DeNomie M, Visotcky A, et al. Increasing Mammography Uptake Through Academic-Community Partnerships Targeting Immigrant and Refugee Communities in Milwaukee. Wmj. 2018;117(2):55-61.

19. Watson MF, Bacigalupe G, Daneshpour M, Han WJ, Parra-Cardona R. COVID-19 Interconnectedness: Health Inequity, the Climate Crisis, and Collective Trauma. Fam Process. 2020;59(3):832-846. doi:10.1111/famp.12572

20. Rafieifar M, Naseh M, Potocky M, et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on refugees and immigrants in the United States: a call for action. International Social Work. 2021;64(5). doi:10.1177/00208728211017964

21. Farley JH, Hines J, Lee NK, et al. Promoting health equity in the era of COVID-19. Gynecologic oncology. 2020;158(1):25-31. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.023

22. World Health Organization Noncommunicable Diseases Department. Rapid Assessment of Service Delivery for Noncommunicable Diseases (NCDs) during the COVID-19 Pandemic. World Health Organization; 2020.

23. Olazagasti C, Duma N. When disparities widen: COVID-19 in minority patients with cancer. Cancer Lett.

24. Hsueh L, Huang J, Millman AK, et al. Disparities in Use of Video Telemedicine Among Patients With Limited English Proficiency During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(11):e2133129-e2133129. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33129

25. Padela AI, Killawi A, Heisler M, Demonner S, Fetters MD. The Role of Imams in American Muslim Health: Perspectives of Muslim Community Leaders in Southeast Michigan. Journal of Religion and Health. 2011;50(2):359-373. doi:10.1007/s10943-010-9428-6

26. Dang CM, Estrada S, Bresee C, Phillips EH. Exploring potential use of internet, E-mail, and instant text messaging to promote breast health and mammogram use among immigrant Hispanic women in Los Angeles County. Am Surg. 2013;79(10):997-1000.

27. Padela AI, Malik S, Ally SA, Quinn M, Hall S, Peek M. Reducing Muslim Mammography Disparities: Outcomes From a Religiously Tailored Mosque-Based Intervention. Health Education & Behavior. 2018;45(6):1025-1035. doi:10.1177/1090198118769371

28. Padela AI, Killawi A, Heisler M, Demonner S, Fetters MD. The role of imams in American Muslim health: perspectives of Muslim community leaders in Southeast Michigan. J Relig Health. 2011;50(2):359-373. doi:10.1007/s10943-010-9428-6

29. Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh AM, Rajkumar R. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(10):954-962.

30. Shah SC, Kayamba V, Peek RM Jr, Heimburger D. Cancer Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Is It Time to Consider Screening? Journal of Global Oncology. 2019;(5):1-8. doi:10.1200/jgo.18.00200

31. Kamaraju S, Drope J, Sankaranarayanan R, Shastri S. Cancer Prevention in Low-Resource Countries: An Overview of the Opportunity. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020;40:1-12. doi:10.1200/edbk_280625

32. Dalton M, Holzman E, Erwin E, et al. Patient navigation services for cancer care in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223537. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223537

33. Mishra GS, Bhatt SH. Novel Program of Using Village Health Workers in Early Detection and Awareness of Head and Neck Cancers: Audit of a Community Screening Program. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(4):488-493. doi:10.1007/s12070-017-1231-1

34. Badal K, Marcellin E, Ashing KT. Development of a Cancer Patient Navigation Training Program for the Caribbean Context. Journal of Oncology Navigation and Survivorship. 2019;10(7).

35. Thompson HS, Sussner K, Schwartz MD, et al. Receipt of genetic counseling recommendations among black women at high risk for BRCA mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16(11):1257-1262. doi:10.1089/gtmb.2012.0114

36. Suther S, Kiros GE. Barriers to the use of genetic testing: a study of racial and ethnic disparities. Genet Med. 2009;11(9):655-662. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181ab22aa

37. Cragun D, Weidner A, Lewis C, et al. Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2017;123(13):2497-2505. doi:10.1002/cncr.30621

38. Kamaraju S, Amanda J, Samantha S, et al. Disparities in Genetic Referrals for Breast Cancer among the Asian Immigrant Populations: How Can We Eliminate Them? Annals of Public Health Reports. 2019;3. doi:10.36959/856/489

39. Nakamura S, Kwong A, Kim SW, et al. Current Status of the Management of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Asia: First Report by the Asian BRCA Consortium. Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(1):53-60. doi:10.1159/000441714

40. Chapman-Davis E, Zhou ZN, Fields JC, et al. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Genetic Testing at a Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(1):35-42. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06064-x

41. Solomons NM, Lamb AE, Lucas FL, McDonald EF, Miesfeldt S. Examination of the Patient-Focused Impact of Cancer Telegenetics Among a Rural Population: Comparison with Traditional In-Person Services. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(2):130-138. doi:10.1089/tmj.2017.0073

42. Permuth-Wey J, Vadaparampil S, Rumphs A, Kinney AY, Pal T. Development of a culturally tailored genetic counseling booklet about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer for Black women. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2010;152A(4):836-845. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33187

43. Tluczek A, Zaleski C, Stachiw-Hietpas D, et al. A tailored approach to family-centered genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis newborn screening: the Wisconsin model. J Genet Couns. 2011;20(2):115-128. doi:10.1007/s10897-010-9332-y

44. Cheung FY, Pratt R, Shire A, Bigalke L, Ahmed Z, Zierhut H. Developing culturally informed genetic services for the Somali immigrants in Minnesota. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2019;28(4):887-896. doi:10.1002/jgc4.1131

45. Miesfeldt S, Feero WG, Lucas FL, Rasmussen K. Association of patient navigation with care coordination in an Lynch syndrome screening program. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8(3):450-455. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibx078

46. Jabson JM. Treatment summaries, follow-up care instructions, and patient navigation: could they be combined to improve cancer survivor's receipt of follow-up care? J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(4):692-698. doi:10.1007/s11764-015-0444-0

47. Rohan EA, McDougall R, Townsend JS. An Exploration of Patient Navigation and Community Health Worker Activities Across National Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs. Health Equity. 2018;2(1):366-374. doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0053

48. Patel MI, Lopez AM, Blackstock W, et al. Cancer Disparities and Health Equity: A Policy Statement From the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020;38(29):3439-3448. doi:10.1200/jco.20.00642

49. Dixit N, Rugo H, Burke NJ. Navigating a Path to Equity in Cancer Care: The Role of Patient Navigation. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. 2021;(41):3-10. doi:10.1200/edbk_100026

50. Padela AI, Murrar S, Adviento B, et al. Associations Between Religion-Related Factors and Breast Cancer Screening Among American Muslims. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2015;17(3):660-669. doi:10.1007/s10903-014-0014-y

51. Bittencourt L, Scarinci IC. Training Community Health Workers to promote breast cancer screening in Brazil. Health Promot Int. 2019;34(1):95-101. doi:10.1093/heapro/dax058

52. Martinez-Donate AP, Halverson J, Simon NJ, et al. Identifying health literacy and health system navigation needs among rural cancer patients: findings from the Rural Oncology Literacy Enhancement Study (ROLES). J Cancer Educ. 2013;28(3):573-581. doi:10.1007/s13187-013-0505-x

53. Lim BT, Huang YJ, Shepherd HL, et al. Health literacy and cancer care coordination in Chinese migrant patients and their carers: a cross-sectional survey. Psychooncology. 2019;28(5):1048-1055. doi:10.1002/pon.5050

54. Wang T, Huilgol YS, Black J, et al. Pre- Appointment Nurse Navigation: Patient-Centered Findings From a Survey of Patients With Breast Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021;25(5):E57-e62. doi:10.1188/21.Cjon.E57-e62

55. Singh GK, Jemal A. Socioeconomic and Racial/ Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Mortality, Incidence, and Survival in the United States, 1950-2014: Over Six Decades of Changing Patterns and Widening Inequalities. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:2819372. doi:10.1155/2017/2819372

56. Truant TLO, Lambert LK, Thorne S. Barriers to Equity in Cancer Survivorship Care: Perspectives of Cancer Survivors and System Stakeholders. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2021;8:23333936211006703. doi:10.1177/23333936211006703

57. Jacobsen PB, Mollica MA. Understanding and addressing global inequities in cancer survivorship care. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and Practice. 2019;1(1):e5. doi:10.1097/or9.0000000000000005

58. Handberg C, Svendsen ML, Maribo T. A Cross- Sectional Study Evaluating Potential Differences in the Need for Cancer Survivorship Care in Relation to Patients' Socioeconomic Status. J Clin Med Res. 2019;11(7):515-523. doi:10.14740/jocmr3871

59. Pratt-Chapman M, Simon MA, Patterson AK, Risendal BC, Patierno S. Survivorship navigation outcome measures: a report from the ACS patient navigation working group on survivorship navigation. Cancer. 2011;117(15 Suppl):3575-3584. doi:10.1002/cncr.26261

60. Reddy S, Saxon M, Patel N, et al. Discordance in Perceptions of Barriers to Breast Cancer Treatment Between Hispanic Women and Their Providers. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2020;7(4):337-342.

61. Wang JH, Adams IF, Tucker-Seeley R, et al. A mixed method exploration of survivorship among Chinese American and non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors: the role of socioeconomic well- being. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(10):2709-2720. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0374-0

62. Laidsaar-Powell R, Konings S, Rankin N, et al. A meta-review of qualitative research on adult cancer survivors: current strengths and evidence gaps. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(6):852-889. doi:10.1007/s11764-019-00803-8

63. Aziz NM. Cancer survivorship research: challenge and opportunity. J Nutr. 2002;132(11 Suppl):3494s-3503s. doi:10.1093/jn/132.11.3494S

64. Wenzel J, Jones R, Klimmek R, Szanton S, Krumm S. Exploring the role of community health workers in providing cancer navigation: perceptions of African American older adults. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012;39(3):E288-98. doi:10.1188/12.Onf.E288-e298

65. Rust CF, Davis C, Moore MR. Medication adherence skills training for African-American breast cancer survivors: the effects on health literacy, medication adherence, and self-efficacy. Soc Work Health Care. 2015;54(1):33-46. doi:10.1080/00981389.2014.964447

66. Piredda M, Migliozzi A, Biagioli V, Carassiti M, De Marinis MG. Written Information Improves Patient Knowledge About Implanted Ports. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016;20(2):E28-33. doi:10.1188/16.Cjon.E28-e33

67. Gonzalez A, Stepan KA. Brief report: a systematic process to design a useful chemotherapy education packet for patients at U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. J Cancer Educ. 2006;21(1):40-42. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce2101_13

68. Foltz AT, Sullivan JM. Limited literacy revisited implications for patient education. Cancer Pract. 1999;7(3):145-150. doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.07304.x

69. Gonzalez BD. Promise of Mobile Health Technology to Reduce Disparities in Patients With Cancer and Survivors. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018;2:1-9. doi:10.1200/cci.17.00141

70. Kim H, Goldsmith JV, Sengupta S, et al. Mobile Health Application and e-Health Literacy: Opportunities and Concerns for Cancer Patients and Caregivers. J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(1):3-8. doi:10.1007/s13187-017-1293-5

71. Bickes D, Jennings K, Feinberg I. Health Literacy Strategies to Engage Cancer Patients and Caregivers. Journal of Oncology Navigation and Survivorship. 2021;12(3).

72. Suk R, Hong YR, Rajan SS, Xie Z, Zhu Y, Spencer JC. Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline–Concordant Cervical Cancer Screening Rates and Reasons for Underscreening by Age, Race and Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Rurality, and Insurance, 2005 to 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(1):e2143582-e2143582. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43582

73. Kim K, Choi JS, Choi E, et al. Effects of Community-Based Health Worker Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Care Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(4):e3-e28. doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302987

74. Mojica CM, Morales-Campos DY, Carmona CM, Ouyang Y, Liang Y. Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Education and Navigation: Results of a Community Health Worker Intervention. Health Promot Pract. 2016;17(3):353-363. doi:10.1177/1524839915603362

75. O'Donovan J, O'Donovan C, Nagraj S. The role of community health workers in cervical cancer screening in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review of the literature. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(3):e001452. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001452